Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

This site uses cookies. By using our services, you agree to our cookie use.
Learn more here.

Folio: Joseph Paxton's National Garden

Paxton_National_Garden_Story

Turing his hand to landscaping, Paxton sought to unite disciplines with a vast garden

Prior to publishing what would become arguably the most famous horticultural periodical - The Gardeners’ Chronicle - in 1831 Joseph Paxton published The Horticultural Register, a monthly magazine embracing everything from natural history and landscaping to propagation and, of course, gardening. Volume 1 featured the plan shown here, drawn by Paxton to demonstrate his ideas for a 50-acre National Garden that would merge the Horticultural, Zoological and Medico-Botanic Societies. The proposal was devised as a response to the announcement of London’s new Zoological Garden - to quote Paxton: ‘we fear science will derive but little real benefit from the establishment of another Zoological Garden, near London’. Instead, Paxton wished to merge the societies together in one space that would cater to all of their research needs and be a popular draw for the public in any metropolis. Divided into four, each quarter pertains to a corner of the globe, housing its respective plants and animals, with plans to further divide these quarters into specific countries. Surrounded by various research structures and with a pagoda-like structure at its centre, a route would guide visitors through this inner-city world-wide safari - complete with carriages in case it rained.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.