Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Pedagogy: XJTLU, Suzhou, China

Despite historic roots in two eminent institutions − Xi’an Jiaotong University, founded in 1896 as the Nanyang Public School, and Liverpool University, the oldest university school of architecture in Britain − the recently established Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (XJTLU), a Sino-British partnership with a freshly minted Department of Architecture, feels completely new

The campus, which began building works in 2005 and will accommodate 10,000 students when complete, is in Suzhou Industrial Park, a 23-minute ultra-high speed rail journey from Shanghai. Everything about the place suggests that the cellophane wrapper has just come off.

Students and staff alike delight in this burgeoning brave new world, a ready-made centre of learning at the heart of China’s fourth largest urban economy. XJTLU wants to be a university led by research and innovation; the current cohort is paving the way for a generation that will be intellectually agile, technically skilled and internationally mobile.


This pioneer spirit translates into an almost giddy optimism about the future, fuelled by an appetite for all that is new. And yet, despite the emphatic absence of the past in everything around them, students are held back by habits embedded in their collective history.

‘Our students are adept at learning’, says Austin Williams, a faculty member (and guest editor of this special issue) ‘but have to be pushed to think for themselves.’ While debate in the UK worries over falling standards in an educational marketplace increasingly guided by consumer logic, rote-learning and regard for authority still hold sway in countries such as China.

Many who teach at XJTLU recognise the importance of treating these values − rooted in traditions that favour compliance and discretion − with due respect. But didactic instruction is unlikely to create conditions in which students can experience the kinds of insights educationists want for them. If academic vitality is the goal, teachers must be encouraged to nurture creativity.


A tug-of-war between educational innovation and doctrinaire conformity, perhaps of grasping at future possibilities while remaining faithful to shared values, played out in the design studio and also in XJTLU rhetoric. Williams acknowledges that the institution’s commitment to sharing the benefits of international collaboration opens up opportunities for pedagogical renewal. ‘Our teaching faculty is drawn from all over the world; each of us brings something different, but we are all excited by China’s dynamism− you can’t help but be! We have strong, diverse attitudes to teaching, and regularly discuss what the process of creative engagement should be.’

A project by students Zixin Tong and Rui Zhe aptly expresses the tension between new ideas and inherited values in a compact design for a public art gallery located in the tightly-packed old town of Suzhou. The pair analysed the urban grain of the ancient town and concluded, according to design tutor Theo Dounas, that its density ‘overwhelms the visitor’. Deformed and distorted by the pressure of the historic fabric at street level, the building offers relief as it rises, reorienting itself to a wider perspective and more generous illumination on its upper levels.

Later in the academic year, Dounas briefed his students to consider the relationship between public space and civic life in a project that explores how architecture might foster conviviality and social exchange. Mengyi Dang and Mingxuan Xie designed a bridge that not only physically connects different levels and buildings but also breathes life into Wenxin Plaza by anticipating new and different ways of using it. Based on the observation that ‘people like to observe other people in public spaces’, the students envisaged a theatrical opportunity to animate and bring greater spatial order to the square.


The four-year BEng degree offered to undergraduates includes a foundation year during which students follow an intensive English language course. Thereafter they begin the degree proper comprising three years of design-led study taught in English, as are all university courses. After graduating from XJTLU, many students choose to continue their studies overseas, and links with the United Kingdom are strong.

The school offers something of a gateway in both directions; it has provided a staging post and shop window for a number of UK practices, including multinational firm Aedas which has been commissioned for design work on campus, and also a venue for academics and professionals to exchange ideas about a global future in which China will play an increasingly significant role. It perfectly exemplifies the knowledge economy of tomorrow: highly mobile and highly adaptive.


This article is part of a series examining the state of architectural education across the world. More discussions of academies and schools from other nations can be found in Pedagogy

Readers' comments (2)

  • The hand-drawn(I presume) pespective drawing at top of this article is totally wrong. I think they should learn how to draw what they see with their own eye before manipulating mouse on computer
    to build virtual model.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Junji Shirai
    The hand-drawn perspective drawing is NOT totally wrong at all, it is a sketch. The sketch was drawn by a first-year undergraduate after 6 weeks. We do teach drawings skills AND CAD skills (I prefer hand-drawing) but both are appropriate at times.
    What the article fails to mention is that XJTLU's architecture department has only been in existence for 1 year and 1 week. I think the quality of student work already rivals some of the best (equivalent level) students in China and across the world.
    We are on track to be the first RIBA-validated department of architecture in China.
    As a point of information, their CAD skills are excellent!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.