Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

This site uses cookies. By using our services, you agree to our cookie use.
Learn more here.

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.
By submitting your information you agree to our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Report comment to moderator

Required fields.

Headline

Outrage: Ronchamp has been undermined with a vengence by Renzo Piano's convent

Comment

I visited the place a few monthes ago. The Chappel of Ronchamp is as magnificent as I had imagined - and more. Piano's building, however, is clearly the wrong intervention to the site. Without any criticysm to the design itself, I clearly felt , on the spot, that something had been misunderstood. The idea of having a second chappelle on site, reminds me of certain house wives, that design a super luxusious kitchen for their new home- never use it- and do all the cooking on a small stove in some corner of the pantry. Were the people of the convent afraid to "overuse" the main chappel? It is sometimes our duty, as Architects, to prevent such nonsense from happening ,even against the clients' wish, which Le Corbusier's Chapel of Ronchamp is very much an example for.

Posted date

9 August, 2012

Posted time

4:02 pm

required
required
required
required