Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Editorial View: Emerging Architecture

Architecture as a critical language with which to face the world

The annual ar+d Awards for Emerging Architecture present a compelling snapshot of the next generation of architects. What are their critical preoccupations? How are they addressing the wider challenges of practice? What’s their take on technology, society and the environment? When this awards programme started out in 1999, the world was a rather different place. There were awards for architects, but they were mainly for careers well spent; younger people rarely got a look in. These days, architecture might still be an old man’s game, but now there more ways to bring the work of young and lesser known architects to wider attention.

As pioneers in recognising and encouraging emerging talent, the AR can take some satisfaction in seeing many of its ‘graduates’ go on to greater things. Sou Fujimoto, Anna Heringer, Bjarke Ingels, Thomas Heatherwick, Sean Godsell and Junya Ishigami are just some of the interesting, thoughtful people who have come up through the AR’s Emerging ranks. Architecture is a long game and it’s always fascinating to track individual career arcs. Where will this year’s winners be in 10 years’ time? And how will the world have changed around them?

Change of the more profound, epochal kind forms the subject of this month’s Big Rethink, which considers frameworks for analysing the awesome and still unfolding narrative of human cultural evolution. Armed with such rich insights, we might thus derive a more profound sense of how we really want to live and how to engage with society. Regular readers might be surprised to see the traditionally monochromatic Campaign pages spring into colour as Peter Buchanan dissects Spiral Dynamics and how its theories relate to architecture. Colour coding identifies different evolutionary eras or ‘memes’, each with their own distinct characteristics that shape human behaviour and interaction. Passing through these different phases we have evolved from cave dwellers to Facebook users, and now have attained the potential to comprehend and be part of a dynamic unfolding of nature and culture. ‘Consistent with this view’, writes Buchanan ‘sustainability is seen not in terms of constraints and sacrifices but as an inspiring vision of a much more purposeful and fulfilling life’.

Yet as a collective, conscious society, we are clearly still struggling to attain such holistic bliss. The fragility of the man-made world was brought into sharp relief by the impact of Hurricane Sandy (p18), which coincided with the passing of Lebbeus Woods at the end of October (p19). Much more than a dystopian ‘paper architect’, Woods speculated poetically and powerfully on architecture’s uneasy relationship with terror, arms and authority. Latterly, as Nicholas Olsberg writes, he turned his attention to the ‘mounting crisis of sustaining a fixed built environment in the face of a catastrophically changing planetary one’. His sobering legacy is to remind us that architecture not a set of ‘plastic aesthetics’, but ‘a unique critical language’ with which to face the world. It’s one hell of a legacy.

Catherine Slessor, Editor

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.