Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

This site uses cookies. By using our services, you agree to our cookie use.
Learn more here.

AR House 2015 Winners Announced

Winning schemes of the Architectural Review’s House Awards 2015 revealed

The AR House Awards celebrate excellence in one-off house design. This year’s jury Adam Caruso, Sofia von Ellrichshausen and Pippo Ciorra, with AR Editor Christine Murray as chair, chose David Chipperfield’s Fayland House as the winner of the AR House Awards 2015 for being a radical new take on the English country house.

Ryo Matsui’s mix of old and new in Rebirth House was highly commended and Dekleva Gregorič’s Compact Karst House was commended for putting traditional methods to fresh purpose.

In this video, they tell us more about why these schemes stood out and how they reached consensus on the judging day.


Winner
Fayland House in England by David Chipperfield Architects

Highly Commended
Rebirth House in Japan by Ryo Matsui

Commended
Compact Karst House in Slovenia by Dekleva Gregorič Arhitekti

‘A house must be like a small city;
a city like a large house’
Aldo van Eyck

Jury and Chair comments

Adam Caruso, Caruso St John
‘The judging was enjoyable. We talked a lot about how minimalist Modernism continues to be such a compelling theme for architect-designed homes. None of us was interested in those projects. We were aware of the significance of choosing a house with a large budget, but so many houses are luxurious these days and yet have so little architectural quality. To make a luxury home that isn’t pompous or a projection of the vanity of its inhabitants is a really difficult thing. Fayland House places a very large house in a special landscape without disappearing. The domestic outdoor spaces, which have always been an issue in English country houses, are in courtyards, which is an innovation.’

Sofia von Ellrichshausen, Pezo von Ellrichshausen
‘In many of the houses that we saw, there was a self-conscious response to the media’s constant demand for novelty, with no link to the conditions of the place where they were made. I hope to be surprised by projects that emerge without knowing if they’ll ever be published or not. The winner, Fayland House, does push what a house is. It takes normal elements and manipulates them. That colonnade in the front and the way it modulates the scale on the landscape is very interesting. It also seems to be very rigid from the outside, but the plan is a lot less obvious, offering differing levels of privacy, and arranged around courtyards. The fact that Chipperfield has a large office but can still maintain a high level of quality in a small-scale project is a lesson, of course.’

Pippo Ciorra, architecture curator, MAXXI 
‘Judging is always a strange experience where you learn a lot. I was very happy to see the global span of the entries, which is extremely successful for the awards, but there were actually many commonalities among the houses. This is very revealing, but also kind of flat. Maybe this architectural world needs to be shaken again. But also it’s a social problem. Single family houses were ghosts in architectural culture, now they are becoming the norm and we need to negotiate how we can build something that is post urban. Fayland House combines fragments of architectural archetypes to create a family house behind one facade with very light circulation. Rather than the vocabulary, what’s interesting is the way these fragments are put together to negotiate a complicated site.’

Christine Murray, Editor, The Architectural Review 
‘The judges set themselves a difficult task: they wanted to find a house that was not just well-designed, but subversive in some way. They found in Chipperfield’s Fayland House a plan that subverted the expectations set up by its rigid, rhythmic facade. The uncomfortable girth of the columns and the way they mediated the landscape was also mentioned. There is accomplished design and perfect detailing here, but also something challenging, uneasy. They also found its restrained opulence interesting, but I think the real enthusiasm was in the courtyards embedded in its asymmetrical plan and that beautiful enfilade. The plan was the thing.’

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.